So why & 39;-we & 39; National Health Insurance In America
The political will & 39; n does not & 39; extent on this issue because of the propaganda , l & 39; AMA still doubt & 39; in the public mind about the success d & 39; such a plan. The first is usually reluctant that our country can not afford to pay for the complete care for the other industrialized countries everyone.
Every provides comprehensive health care for all at a price well below that of our system that leaves many people. D & 39; other countries devote 6-10 per cent of their gross domestic product or GDP, while we are the richest nation on earth, a 14% of our countries are already enough GDP.
Our d & 39; The funds for health care d & 39; offer the best quality care for Everyone. The study by the Congressional Budget Office, the General Accounting Office, the group of Lewin and the Boston University School of Public Health have shown that under & 39; paying agent system for a single, comprehensive care can be provided For all without more resources that are in the d & 39; spent.
There had much about the delays in the acceptance of benefits districts, the characteristics of other nations, particularly the United Kingdom and Canada. The interest rate of 6% and 9% of GDP, and they spend much less, we nation.
Not just as we have more than enough money, we are also a nation that is notorious for our capacity in health care. Typical of these excesses, is the fact that & 39; more than MRI scanner in Orange County, California, in the & 39; all our Canada.
With generous funding and the enormous capacity our system of health care, the delay was not a major limiting factor in the US
& quot; The Americans do not want the medicine socialis e ", it is often an expression of nonchalance to reject the notion of paying agent. Sozialisieren medicine is a system in which the government is the owner of the plant, and the service providers are employees.
In contrast, a single donor d & 39; order, the existing system of public and private sector systems the provision of health, the preservation of property and employment & 39;. The specificity of a single donor & 39 d & 39; order is that all systems of health risks in a pool of universal danger for everyone. The pool is used by & 39; just and fair, so that everyone pays his fair share d & 39; taxes, as opposed to our current system in which some erroneous much to pay, while others d & ; amp; 39; not pay. The funds are provided by the & 39, 39 & involvement, a publicly administered program & 39; from the use of our health care dollars.
A paying agent & 39; s single system not more points Together with the medicine that our current socialis e Medicare program.
Many view that the government bureaucracies are very wastage in comparison to & 39; effectiveness of the private market. In the area of health care, the & 39; n was not the case. Our Medicare program, a publicly administered program, the administration at the expense of less than 2%. The organization of care consume mediators from 9 to 30% of health care dollar.
This difference is due to the large companies administrations, the cost of competition between companies and marketing costs that would not exist in a program. Only one donor d & 39; order system has the task of & 39; optimization of resources for the improvement of patient care. The money will not be wasted on companies administrative rules excesses.
Another argument is that from a single donor & 39 d & 39; order, as a universal, would reduce the standard of care at a level of mediocrity for all the world that the richest d & 39; exercise its option to secure the highest level of care.
However, our current system is characterized by essentially two options: either no insurance with a serious impairment of Access & amp , 39; even a bad performance levels, or d & 39; done by an organization of care that & 39; industry declined, which is available until & 39; that The mediocrity is the standard of care obligations. Only the rich have unlimited access care.
The relatively generous amount of resources that we already have on the health care and adds a more efficient administration d & 39; a mission exclusive optimal care about the well mediocrity, we Now, creates the basis d & 39, a universal system of health care to the single paying agency & 39; n America.
A system prevents the rich not to pay the outside of the system, for a Penthouse after & l; 39; hospital, or for cosmetic surgery or for any other service, which should not be a part & 39; financed by public funds, the program.
Other l & 39 ; insurance, which each have a cover for the health, there is an even greater although d & 39; a single donor d & 39; system put our nation: Making and preventive services in the field of public health for everyone d & 39; improve the level of health of the country. Reduction of communicable diseases and to reduce the high cost of chronic diseases are not treated all.
Healthy people help us, for example, a healthy workforce with less loss of working hours, higher productivity and a positive environment.
Socialism healthy is a big word in this country. Universal health care for all was as a synonym for socialism, and much propaganda by the press, by politicians from the right, by groups such as medical l & 39; AMA or any other person who is an agenda to keep the 1500 Company d & 39; health insurance, prosperous market value, without doubt help their agendas.
But if the Americans know the truth and turn off their televisions and d & 39; this time, instead of the country, you can change the political base, it only needs a donor d & 39; order a universal system for all reality, we will finally, the best health care system in the world. The Green Party in this country has such & 39; One of their tasks d & 39; afford universal health care for all Americans.
Any group, with the tendency to change the world, one issue at a time, With a loving intentions, it can do so.
