Detalii aici aici despre principiile artei teoretice

in romaneste

The difference between classical and primitive society is made by the relation to other communities. The primitive society has primitive and equal advanced weapons and the war between communities has no winner. If there would be a winner community then it transforms from primitive to classical one that manages to transform the losers into slaves and to develop a new social strategy based rather on slavery than making wars and rob the ones who cultivate land and rising animals. The deficiency of weapons is the most important criteria for classical society. The ability to conquest and to collect products from large territories implies the power of empire. The soldier decides to fight in war and to steal by the power of weapons from others the needed objects of consume instead of directly producing them. The empires develop as a parasite structure upon the communities that manage to conquest. By doing so the empire is a kind of mafia.

Here is the origin of masters and slaves. Insubordination is not tolerated. The classic social system rules are cultivated by education. The top of social pyramid is meant to have the absolute power, having the image of belonging to divinity in order to obey the slaves.

The wars between empires for territories and slaves showed up different kind of warrior: the hero and the terrorist. They are almost the same but seen by one side or another involved in the cultural conflict or war. The only difference between them lies in the moment they usually act: the peace for terrorist and the war for hero. The common people suffer their actions no matter if terrorist or heroic. The culture of hero and heroic actions belongs to classical mentality. The hero's image is made by the master in exchange for the benefits of its interests. Hero always put the master's interest before that of the slave. The opposite turns the image of hero into one of the thief, criminal, and bandit. Actually the hero's mentality is the one of colonialist one, that of military domination.

On the other hand the terrorists usually do not harm the politicians but the people because the politicians are well protected. If one manages to kill a politician then s/he is just a murderer before being a terrorist. The goal of terrorism is the same with the one of absolute master; to frighten the people and to accept slavery as beasts from circus are afraid by the lash. The terrorist loves war and wants to conquest and to rob.

The terrorist is another side of modern army . Every army needs the terrorists to justify and hide their parasite role of protection the politicians in the community. In this way bigger founds are detached from general budget of community and thrown away instead of improving life of people that gets harder and harder and the army and secret (de)services needs more money to (in)secure”. The development of community is trapped.

All the wars bring to the empire two main benefits. The first one is the conquest of new land/slaves. The second one is the expression of people's anger to the other communities, outside of the empire's master that enslaved them. After the war all the survivors are physically and mentally mutilated and do not think again to revolt. They just accept their fate of slaves. So, the institution of army has another important goal in the empire.

All the contemporary armies pretend that their goal is to defend their people from other armies or from terrorists. All of them do not say a word about their original goal of robbery. If they would admit this legacy of original robbery then the people might question their role in the society during the peace period and about the causes that ends it. But the army has another goal. Its number one order is to protect authorities from the revolt of people that is about to explode. As politicians, the army just parasite the society and uses its people as a robbed community, in the way it was at its origins.

The conspiracy theories that present journalistic evidence about self-destruction of 9/11 or Pearl Harbor events might be wrong as any kind of journalism uses lies and manipulation. But the fact that new empires like USA get bigger and the people lose its rights in front of authorities is true. So it does not matter if the conspiracy theories are false of true because the consequences are the same for the case they would be true.

 

 

Attacking and enslaving other communities is the politician's classical solution for frustrated people. The Iraqi war was meant to remake this traditional way of behavior. Under the excuse of protection against terrorism the Iraqi war first goal was to get down Saddam Hussein and to develop oil business. The modern corporations are some armies that replaced the physical work slaves with the work of machines (and the modern slaves just drive them). As the classical armies robbed other communities and developed the empires also the corporations do the same not with the power of weapons by with the power of convincing. The western culture trampled and brutally entered deep into classical or primitive cultures with economical (and political) strange interests. The lies, the manipulation and disrespect for people's native culture joined this economical conquest. This disturbance produced a conflict between civilizations. The terrorists' problems are the same of classical empires. The rival empires fight each other for territories and slaves. In the same way Islamic world felt offended by this disturbance of new western empires. That is why Islamic terrorism became so powerful.

But the terrorism was not invented by traditional society like middle orient countries. The terrorism is a crude reality of western consumerist society destroying itself under the pressures of imperial/ empyreal/empire's ideology. The Islamic terrorist is mainly a western educated person. There is a small difference between such person and the native western people who commits terrorist attacks in their own communities. The guilt and punishment spread by wild education into slave's mind produces a powerful desire to become powerful her/himself and to escape this social statute. The classical culture makes human being to run from its natural behavior in order to identify with a higher reality. The thief, the bandit, the outlaw tries to get out of the master's influence and to live on their own by harassing the system.

Sometime the people just cannot take it anymore and kill themselves and the others by revenge. One might prefer to accept that these people are influenced by devil in their criminal actions. But I do not believe in devil existence and look to another causes. And I have some clues that make me believe that there are deeper unsolved cultural and social problems that involve theses terrible consequences. If we do not try to solve them the situation will be worse.